Experimental and Numerical Analysis of a Compact Indirect Solar Dehumidification System
Loading...

Date
2021
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Drying foods and medicinal plants is a process with high energy consumption because high amount of energy is needed for evaporating the water from the surface of the fresh materials. Therefore, developing cost-effective and simple-structured drying systems with low energy demand is a crucial matter. In the present study, compact type solar dryers have been designed, manufactured and tested experimentally. Within this context, thermal and flow behavior of compact dryers with and without baffles have been analyzed using CFD method. Then, fabricated compact dryers have been experimented at different conditions to determine their performance. Experimental and numerical findings of this study illustrated the effective design of the developed compact solar dryers. However, compact solar dryer with baffles exhibited better performance than the solar dryer without baffles. According to the experimental results, mean specific moisture extraction rate in compact dryers with and without baffles obtained between the ranges of 0.55-0.69 and 0.47-0.62 kg/kWh, respectively. In addition, average exergy efficiency of drying chambers was attained over the range of 44.91-55.28%. Overall findings of this study indicated successfulness of a compact solar dryer which developed using simple and lightweight materials.
Description
Tuncer, Azim Doğuş/0000-0002-8098-6417; Afshari, Faraz/0000-0001-9192-5604;
Keywords
Compact, Indirect Solar Dryer, Baffle, Energy-Exergy
Fields of Science
0211 other engineering and technologies, 0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, 02 engineering and technology
Citation
WoS Q
Q2
Scopus Q
Q1

OpenCitations Citation Count
42
Source
Solar Energy
Volume
226
Issue
Start Page
72
End Page
84
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 43
Scopus : 51
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 41
SCOPUS™ Citations
52
checked on Apr 10, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
50
checked on Apr 10, 2026
Google Scholar™


