Bilgilendirme: Kurulum ve veri kapsamındaki çalışmalar devam etmektedir. Göstereceğiniz anlayış için teşekkür ederiz.
 

Comparative Analysis of the Health-Related Physical Fitness Scorecard and Fitnessgram, Alpha, and AAHPERD Test Batteries

Loading...
Publication Logo

Date

2026

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Malque Publishing

Open Access Color

Green Open Access

No

OpenAIRE Downloads

OpenAIRE Views

Publicly Funded

No
Impulse
Average
Influence
Average
Popularity
Average

Research Projects

Journal Issue

Abstract

Physical fitness assessments are an important tool in determining the health status of children and adolescents. Examining the compatibility among different test batteries is critically important for developing national and international test batteries. This study aims to analyze the compatibility and differences between the Health-Related-Physical-FitnessScorecard (HRPFS) and internationally recognized FITNESSGRAM, ALPHA, and AAHPERD test batteries. The study involved 100 students from grades 6 to 8 who were administered the HRPFS, FITNESSGRAM, ALPHA, and AAHPERD test batteries. The relationships between tests measuring similar motor skills across different test batteries were analyzed using Pearson correlation analysis. In contrast, canonical correlation analysis was employed to assess the overall compatibility between the test batteries. The results revealed a high correlation between HRPFS and FITNESSGRAM (r = 0.816), a moderate correlation with AAHPERD (r = 0.604), and a low correlation with ALPHA (r = 0.277). A moderate positive correlation (r = 0.342) was also identified between the HRPFS Push-Up Test and the FITNESSGRAM Flexed Arm Hang Test. Similarly, a moderate positive correlation (r = 0.367) was found between the HRPFS Sit and Reach Test and the FITNESSGRAM TrunkLift Test. However, HRPFS showed lower compatibility with international test batteries in muscular endurance and aerobic performance assessments. For instance, a low negative correlation (r = -0.213) was observed between ALPHA’s 20 meter Shuttle Run and FITNESSGRAM’s One mile Run/Walk Test. The findings suggest that while HRPFS is an effective nationallevel test battery, its scope should be expanded. Incorporating tests that evaluate endurance, speed, agility, explosive power could enhance its compatibility with international test batteries. The FITNESSGRAM test battery emerges as a significant reference point for HRPFS, particularly regarding push-up, sit-up, and flexibility assessments. This study provides concrete recommendations for developing HRPFS and contributes to aligning physical fitness assessments in Turkey with international standards. © (c) 2026 The Authors. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Description

Keywords

AAHPERD, Alpha, Fitnessgram, Physical Fitness, Test Battery Analysis

Fields of Science

Citation

WoS Q

N/A

Scopus Q

N/A
OpenCitations Logo
OpenCitations Citation Count
N/A

Source

Multidisciplinary Science Journal

Volume

8

Issue

4

Start Page

2026268

End Page

PlumX Metrics
Citations

Scopus : 0

Captures

Mendeley Readers : 2

Google Scholar Logo
Google Scholar™
OpenAlex Logo
OpenAlex FWCI
0.0

Sustainable Development Goals