Bilgilendirme: Kurulum ve veri kapsamındaki çalışmalar devam etmektedir. Göstereceğiniz anlayış için teşekkür ederiz.
 

Biomechanical Analysis of Spinal Implants with Different Rod Diameters Under Static and Fatigue Loads: An Experimental Study

dc.contributor.author Kovaci, Halim
dc.contributor.author Yetim, Ali Fatih
dc.contributor.author Celik, Ayhan
dc.date.accessioned 2026-03-26T14:52:12Z
dc.date.available 2026-03-26T14:52:12Z
dc.date.issued 2019
dc.description Yetim, A Fatih/0000-0002-4314-6830; Çelik, Ayhan/0000-0002-8096-0794; Kovacı, Halim/0000-0002-9053-3593 en_US
dc.description.abstract Spinal implants are commonly used in the treatment of spinal disorders or injuries. However, the biomechanical analyses of them are rarely investigated in terms of both biomechanical and clinical perspectives. Therefore, the main purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of rod diameter on the biomechanical behavior of spinal implants and to make a comparison among them. For this purpose, three spinal implants composed of pedicle screws, setscrews and rods, which were manufactured from Ti6Al4V, with diameters of 5.5 mm, 6 mm and 6.35 mm were used and a bilateral vertebrectomy model was applied to spinal systems. Then, the obtained spinal systems were tested under static tension-compression and fatigue (dynamic compression) conditions. Also, failure analyses were performed to investigate the fatigue behavior of spinal implants. After static tension-compression and fatigue tests, it was found that the yield loads, stiffness values, load carrying capacities and fatigue performances of spinal implants enhanced with increasing spinal rod diameter. In comparison to spinal implants with 5.5 mm rods, the fatigue limits of implants showed 13% and 33% improvements in spinal implants having 6 mm and 6.35 mm rods, respectively. The highest static and fatigue test results were obtained from spinal implants having 6.35 mm rods among the tested implants. Also, it was observed that the increasing yield load and stiffness values caused an increase in the fatigue limits of spinal implants. en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.1515/bmt-2017-0236
dc.identifier.issn 0013-5585
dc.identifier.issn 1862-278X
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85049571229
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1515/bmt-2017-0236
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14901/2427
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Walter de Gruyter GmbH en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Biomedical Engineering-Biomedizinische Technik en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.subject Fatigue en_US
dc.subject Spine Biomechanics en_US
dc.subject Spinal Implant en_US
dc.subject Spinal Rod en_US
dc.subject Tension and Compression en_US
dc.title Biomechanical Analysis of Spinal Implants with Different Rod Diameters Under Static and Fatigue Loads: An Experimental Study en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.id Yetim, A Fatih/0000-0002-4314-6830
gdc.author.id Çelik, Ayhan/0000-0002-8096-0794
gdc.author.id Kovacı, Halim/0000-0002-9053-3593
gdc.author.scopusid 55550279400
gdc.author.scopusid 14831890100
gdc.author.scopusid 55416073900
gdc.author.wosid Çelik, Ayhan/Aah-3782-2020
gdc.author.wosid Kovacı, Halim/Ivh-4810-2023
gdc.description.department Erzurum Technical University en_US
gdc.description.departmenttemp [Kovaci, Halim; Celik, Ayhan] Ataturk Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Engn Fac, TR-25240 Erzurum, Turkey; [Yetim, Ali Fatih] Erzurum Tech Univ, Engn & Architecture Fac, Dept Mech Engn, TR-25700 Erzurum, Turkey en_US
gdc.description.endpage 346 en_US
gdc.description.issue 3 en_US
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality Q3
gdc.description.startpage 339 en_US
gdc.description.volume 64 en_US
gdc.description.woscitationindex Science Citation Index Expanded
gdc.description.wosquality Q3
gdc.identifier.pmid 29935109
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:000468766800009
gdc.index.type Scopus
gdc.virtual.author Yetim, Ali Fatih
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 81334d02-b55f-4b40-99d3-1a83e6541b78
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 81334d02-b55f-4b40-99d3-1a83e6541b78

Files