Comparative Biomechanical Evaluation of Spinal Cages Made from Pcl, Peek, and Ti6al4v Via Support-Free Additive Manufacturing

dc.contributor.author Murat, Fahri
dc.contributor.author Kaymaz, Irfan
dc.date.accessioned 2026-03-26T14:56:55Z
dc.date.available 2026-03-26T14:56:55Z
dc.date.issued 2025
dc.description Murat, Fahri/0000-0002-9513-7813 en_US
dc.description.abstract This study introduces a novel biodegradable spinal cage design optimized for additive manufacturing (AM) through topology optimization with overhang constraints, enabling the fabrication of designs without the need for support structures. The biomechanical performance of nonbiodegradable materials (Ti6Al4V and PEEK) and a biodegradable polymer (PCL) was evaluated using finite element analysis (FEA) and mechanical testing. A multilevel spinal model (T10-S1) simulates realistic biomechanics, focusing on the L4-L5 segment with a gyroid porous structure. Results demonstrate that Ti6Al4V exhibits the highest stiffness (78000 N mm-1) but raises stress-shielding concerns due to von Mises stress peaks (112.3 MPa). In contrast, PEEK and PCL demonstrate lower stress values (9.40 MPa and 7.59 MPa, respectively) and better biomechanical compatibility with spinal discs. This study highlights the potential of AM-filtered designs combined with biodegradable materials, such as PEEK and PCL, to advance patient-specific spinal cage applications while addressing challenges in AM fabrication. By eliminating support structures, this approach reduces material waste, manufacturing time, and postprocessing requirements, making spinal cage production more efficient and sustainable. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) [TUBITAK-223M468] en_US
dc.description.sponsorship This study was supported by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) under the Project code TUBITAK-223M468. The authors would like to thank TUB & Idot;TAK for its contributions. en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.1002/adem.202500421
dc.identifier.issn 1438-1656
dc.identifier.issn 1527-2648
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-105009490152
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.202500421
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14901/2952
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Wiley-V C H Verlag GmbH en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Advanced Engineering Materials en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.subject Additive Manufacturing en_US
dc.subject Gyroid Lattice Structures en_US
dc.subject Intervertebral Cage Designs en_US
dc.subject Topology Optimization en_US
dc.title Comparative Biomechanical Evaluation of Spinal Cages Made from Pcl, Peek, and Ti6al4v Via Support-Free Additive Manufacturing en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.id Murat, Fahri/0000-0002-9513-7813
gdc.author.scopusid 57223354896
gdc.author.scopusid 56200599600
gdc.author.wosid Kaymaz, Irfan/Abc-6644-2020
gdc.author.wosid Murat, Fahri/Oeo-9986-2025
gdc.description.department Erzurum Technical University en_US
gdc.description.departmenttemp [Murat, Fahri; Kaymaz, Irfan] Erzurum Tech Univ, Dept Mech Engn, TR-25100 Yakutiye, Erzurum, Turkiye en_US
gdc.description.issue 15 en_US
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality Q2
gdc.description.volume 27 en_US
gdc.description.woscitationindex Science Citation Index Expanded
gdc.description.wosquality Q2
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:001520315800001
gdc.index.type Scopus
gdc.virtual.author Murat, Fahri
gdc.virtual.author Kaymaz, İrfan
relation.isAuthorOfPublication c99887bc-c013-4987-b7f3-ad8d1b54fd5f
relation.isAuthorOfPublication aa898e8a-765b-4c53-92d8-ea9053c50f9f
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery c99887bc-c013-4987-b7f3-ad8d1b54fd5f

Files