A Multi-Criteria Neutrosophic Group Decision Making Method Based TOPSIS for Supplier Selection
Loading...

Date
2016
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Natural Sciences Publishing USA nsp@naturalspublishing.com
Open Access Color
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Abstract
The process of multi-criteria group decision making (MCGDM) is of determining the best choice among all of the probable alternatives. The problem of supplier selection on which decision maker has usually vague and imprecise knowledge is a typical example ofmulti criteria group decision-making problem. The conventional crisp techniques has notmuch effective for solvingMCDMproblems because of imprecise or fuzziness nature of the linguistic assessments. To find the exact values for MCGDM problems is both difficult and impossible in more cases in real world. So, it is more reasonable to consider the values of alternatives according to the criteria as single valued neutrosophic sets (SVNS). This paper deal with the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) approach and extend the TOPSIS method to MCGDM problem with single valued neutrosophic information. The value of each alternative and the weight of each criterion are characterized by single valued neutrosophic numbers. Here, the importance of criteria and alternatives is identified by aggregating individual opinions of decision makers (DMs) via single valued neutrosophic weighted averaging (SVNWA) operator. The proposed method is, easy use, precise and practical for solving MCGDM problem with single valued neutrosophic data. Finally, to show the applicability of the developed method, a numerical experiment for supplier choice is given as an application of single valued neutrosophic TOPSIS method at end of this paper. © 2016 NSP.
Description
Keywords
Distance Measure, Multi-Criteria Group Decision Making, Neutrosophic Sets, Single Valued Neutrosophic Sets, TOPSIS Method
Fields of Science
Citation
WoS Q
N/A
Scopus Q
Q3
Source
Applied Mathematics and Information Sciences
Volume
10
Issue
5
Start Page
1843
End Page
1852
